Published

Shared Responsibility: Understanding Scope 3 Carbon Emissions in Supply Chains

By

As the world grapples with the urgent need to combat climate change, understanding the various facets of carbon emissions becomes crucial. While Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are directly linked to a company's operations and energy use, Scope 3 emissions present a more complex scenario. These emissions, often overlooked, are a vital part of the carbon footprint of any organization, especially when considering the entirety of supply chains.

What are Scope 3 Emissions?

Scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain. They include all sources not within an organization's direct control, such as business travel, procurement, waste disposal, and use of sold products. Unlike Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from the generation of purchased energy), Scope 3 emissions can be numerous and varied, depending on the nature of the business.

The Logic of Shared Emissions in Supply Chains

In a supply chain, Scope 3 emissions are not confined to one link but are shared across multiple businesses. For instance, the emissions from manufacturing a product are not just the concern of the manufacturing company but also of the businesses involved in sourcing raw materials, transportation, and selling the final product. This interconnected nature underscores the importance of collective action in managing these emissions.

Reporting Scope 3 Emissions – Not Double Counting but Shared Accounting

There is a common misconception that reporting Scope 3 emissions leads to double counting. However, this process is more about shared accounting than duplication. Accurate reporting of these emissions enables businesses to understand the full extent of their carbon footprint and identify opportunities for reduction. Standardized reporting, in line with global protocols like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, ensures consistency and comparability across businesses.

The Case for Shared Responsibility

The shared nature of Scope 3 emissions implies that each entity in the supply chain bears equal responsibility. This collective approach is beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, it allows for a comprehensive understanding of the environmental impact of products and services. Secondly, it drives innovation and efficiency in the supply chain, leading to reduced costs and enhanced sustainability. Finally, it strengthens corporate reputation and stakeholder trust.

Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the clear benefits, businesses face significant challenges in tracking and managing Scope 3 emissions. These include data availability, quality, and the complexity of supply chain structures. However, advancements in technology, such as AI and blockchain, are making it easier to monitor and report these emissions. Additionally, there is a growing role for government regulations and incentives in promoting responsible practices.


In conclusion, managing Scope 3 emissions is not just a matter of regulatory compliance or environmental stewardship; it is a strategic imperative for businesses. Acknowledging and addressing these emissions as part of a shared responsibility is critical in the collective fight against climate change. As companies continue to innovate and collaborate, the goal of reducing Scope 3 emissions becomes increasingly attainable, paving the way for a more sustainable future for all.



Try our online NetZero Calculators or start a Free Training Course on energy and carbon topics. Make an appointment to chat about your business requirements, energy planning, and Net Zero journey. Visit our website for more information on www.BryceEnergyServices.com and how we can help your business on its NetZero journey.

Photos
5a826d22d3d06967fecc84bbcd21026b.jpg
Published by
Bryce Energy Services Ltd

Bryce Energy Services Ltd

Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8BS

01915806543

View details