Published

Artificial or Real Christmas Trees: The Carbon Footprint Dilemma

By
The festive season is upon us, and while visiting family in Wigan, I had the chance to visit Bents Garden Centre in Warrington. The place was a wonderland of Christmas spirit, with aisles overflowing with every type of decoration imaginable—from £1 baubles to £1,000 artificial trees. It got me thinking again about an ongoing debate: Which is better for the environment—an artificial Christmas tree or a real one?

Let's break down the environmental pros and cons of each option to see if there’s a clear winner.


Real Christmas Trees: The Natural Choice?
Advantages:
Carbon Sequestration: While growing, real trees absorb CO₂ from the atmosphere, helping to offset their overall carbon footprint.
Biodegradable: At the end of the season, a real tree can be recycled into wood chips or mulch. Most cities now offer programs to turn them into biomass for electricity generation, contributing to renewable energy sources.
Local Sourcing: If you buy from a local farm, you reduce transportation emissions. Plus, real trees support local economies and often come from sustainable farms that replant for every tree cut down.

Disadvantages:
Carbon Footprint of Transport: Trees are heavy and bulky, requiring trucks to deliver them to retailers and homes. This can add up if the tree must travel a significant distance.
Water Use: Growing Christmas trees requires a substantial amount of water, particularly if they’re grown in regions where water scarcity is an issue.
Short Lifespan: A real tree lasts only one season. Unless it’s responsibly recycled, it can end up in a landfill, where it will emit methane as it decomposes.

So, Are Real Trees Net Zero?
If properly disposed of through composting or biomass conversion, a real tree can be close to net zero. The emissions from transportation and disposal are balanced by the carbon captured during its growth, assuming sustainable farming practices are followed.


Artificial Christmas Trees: A One-Time Investment?
Advantages:
Longevity: An artificial tree can last for many years—often 10 to 20 years or more if well cared for. This longevity can spread out the environmental impact over a longer time frame.
Low Maintenance: Unlike real trees, artificial ones don’t need watering, won’t drop needles, and are often fire-resistant.
No Transport Every Year: Once purchased, it’s a one-time delivery, reducing annual transportation emissions compared to buying a fresh tree each year.

Disadvantages:
High Carbon Footprint of Production: Most artificial trees are made of PVC (a type of plastic) and metal, both of which require significant energy to produce, often using fossil fuels. Plus, most of these trees are manufactured in China, adding to their carbon footprint due to long shipping routes.
Non-Biodegradable: Once disposed of, an artificial tree will likely end up in a landfill, where it will take hundreds of years to decompose. Recycling options are limited, given the combination of materials used.
Chemical Impact: The production of artificial trees involves the use of chemicals that can be harmful to the environment. Additionally, some older models may contain traces of lead.

Is an Artificial Tree Worth It?
The answer largely depends on how long you plan to keep it. The environmental impact of an artificial tree becomes more favourable if it's used for at least 10 years. However, considering how trends change and social pressures mount each year to have “the latest look,” this longevity may not always be realistic for everyone.


Reflecting on Our Christmas Habits

Personally, I have an artificial tree that I bought over 15 years ago, and it’s still going strong. I’ve always believed in the idea that less is more when it comes to Christmas decorations. In a world where every TV advert seems to feature perfectly staged homes dripping in fairy lights and lavish décor, it’s easy to feel like your modest decorations fall short. But perhaps it’s time to push back against that pressure.

After all, the essence of the holiday season isn’t about how many lights you can hang on your house or how grand your tree is—it’s about slowing down, spending time with loved ones, and reflecting on what truly matters. For me, that means a simple tree, ideally real, if possible, with the main room and mantelpiece thoughtfully decorated.


Choosing What’s Right for You
In the end, the decision between a real or artificial Christmas tree boils down to your values, budget, and long-term commitment. If you’re the type who enjoys the scent of fresh pine and wants to support local farmers, a real tree might be for you. If, on the other hand, you’re looking for a low-maintenance, long-term option, an artificial tree might be the better choice—provided you’re committed to keeping it for many years.

Whatever you choose, remember that sustainability doesn’t require perfection. It’s about making conscious choices and reflecting on how we can make our traditions just a little bit kinder to the planet.


Photos
artificial-or-real-christmas-trees-the-carbon-footprint-dilemma
Published by
Bryce Energy Services Ltd

Bryce Energy Services Ltd

Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8BS

01915806543

View details