Gain access to Skype users who can contact your business for free
In the past, businesses have paid thousands of pounds to use a freephone number which they have hoped would attract clients not wanting to pay for the call. In...
In the past, businesses have paid thousands of pounds to use a freephone number which they have hoped would attract clients not wanting to pay for the call. In...
During the current lockdown, if it is reasonable and possible for employees to work from home then you should allow them to do so. Use these top tips to effecti...
A commercial tenant has been refused permission to re-amend its defence to a service charge claim four weeks before trial. Stephanie Johnson Associate Solicito...
Need a key cog in your business? This time we recruited... for ourselves! And what a successful project that's been. We're delighted to announce that Ki...
Make the most of your tax-saving opportunities before 5 April. The end of this tax year – 5 April – is approaching fast. So act now to make sure you’ve thoug...
Looking to learn something new?Short on time?Ready for some FREE training on a topic of interest to you? Our Bitesize Briefings are taking place on Wednesdays...
The Court of Appeal has ruled that a travel agency was wrong to take client contact information disclosed by its competitor’s former employees and add it to its own computer database.
Mark Aspin Director and Head of Dispute Resolution reports.
The issue arose after the agency, Trailfinders, hired some employees from a rival agency, Travel Counsellors Ltd (TCL).
Trailfinders expected new employees to bring their own customers and encouraged them to bring their existing customer contact list with them. They were not warned about any risk of breach of confidence in doing so.
The judge at the original hearing held that at least two of the employees were in breach of the term of confidence implied into their respective contracts of employment with Trailfinders.
Trailfinders was in breach of an equitable obligation of confidence which it owed to TCL.
The Court of Appeal upheld those decisions.
It agreed that a reasonable person in the Trailfinders’ position would have made enquiries as to whether the information being provided by the employees was likely to be confidential.
If it had made those inquiries, it would have discovered that some of the information came from the rival’s client database.
The quantity of information disclosed by one of the former employees showed that Trailfinders should have known that at least some of the information was likely to be confidential to TCL.
It must have appreciated that the employee could not carry all that information in his memory, making it probable that he had copied at least some of it from the rival’s database.
If you would like more information about the issues raised in this article please contact Mark on 01228 585245.
NATIONWIDE COLLABORATION & SHARINGAs our share platforms have continued to grow, so too have our online meet ups! Join us for our next fortnightly meet up wher...
Whether you are in the early stages and just seeking information or you have been considering adoption for a while, joining us at one of our online information...
Whether you are in the early stages and just seeking information or you have been considering adoption for a while, joining us at one of our online information...
NATIONWIDE COLLABORATION & SHARINGAs our share platforms have continued to grow, so too have our online meet ups! Join us for our next fortnightly meet up wher...
This Cyber Resilience Workshop equips SME business leaders with the tools to navigate cyber security's evolving landscape.Exploring where innovation meets resil...
Attending a Fostering information event is a great place to start if you want to learn about the process of becoming a foster carer.We understand that making th...