Make 2020 a less taxing year
This year, make the best use of tax reliefs and allowances to help secure your financial future and the inheritance you leave to your loved ones. Well over...
This year, make the best use of tax reliefs and allowances to help secure your financial future and the inheritance you leave to your loved ones. Well over...
Hello All, Hope you're doing well and finding ways through this challenging time. We're Shed 1 Distillery, Andy and Zoe Arnold-Bennett and we opened The Old Ca...
AMY FALLOWS ASSOCIATE SOLICITOR IN OUR FAMILY LAW TEAM PROVIDES UPDATE. The moment many separated couples have been waiting for is nearly here… the true ‘quick...
BY MARK ASPIN DIRECTOR AND HEAD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION A finance company has successfully enforced a non-compete clause preventing an employee joining a rival f...
Yesterday saw us update our servers and online payment (for memberships and renewals). There was some disruption but hopefully everything is now cleared up and...
THE GOVERNMENT HAS PUBLISHED ITS NEW BILL DESIGNED TO RELIEVE THE PRESSURE ON BUSINESSES DURING THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) OUTBREAK. David Tew Solicitor in our...
The tenants of eleven terrace houses had no right to acquire the freehold title as their leases excluded certain structural parts of their property.
That was the decision of the High Court in a case involving Freehold Properties 250 Ltd v Beverley Ann Field & 18 Ors (2020).
Freehold Properties appealed against a decision of the County Court that 11 of its properties fell within the scope of the enfranchisement regime under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
The properties in question were terraced or semi-detached houses on an estate. The leaseholders sought declarations as to whether they were entitled to enfranchise under Part I of the Act.
The terms of the leases excluded certain structural parts of the property such as load bearing walls, the foundations and the roof.
Freehold Properties contended that the leaseholders had no right to acquire the freeholds, arguing that they fell outside the scope of the Act.
The recorder ruled in favour of the leaseholders, but the High Court has reversed that decision.
It held that under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, the phrase “a tenant of a leasehold house” should be read as “a tenant of substantially the whole of a leasehold house”. This meant tenants could not qualify for enfranchisement where the lease did not extend to the roof or the foundations, as in this case.
Please contact our team on 01228 585716 if you would like more information about the issues raised in this article, or if you have enquiries about how to acquire the freehold of a leasehold property.
NATIONWIDE COLLABORATION & SHARINGAs our share platforms have continued to grow, so too have our online meet ups! Join us for our next fortnightly meet up wher...
This Cyber Resilience Workshop equips SME business leaders with the tools to navigate cyber security's evolving landscape.Exploring where innovation meets resil...
Attending a Fostering information event is a great place to start if you want to learn about the process of becoming a foster carer.We understand that making th...
Whether you are in the early stages and just seeking information or you have been considering adoption for a while, joining us at one of our online information...
NATIONWIDE COLLABORATION & SHARINGAs our share platforms have continued to grow, so too have our online meet ups! Join us for our next fortnightly meet up wher...
This Cyber Resilience Workshop equips SME business leaders with the tools to navigate cyber security's evolving landscape.Exploring where innovation meets resil...